Saturday, January 10, 2026
Summary
The Iranian regime's lethal response to widespread protests, including internet shutdowns and live ammunition, earns an 'Absolutely Democracy-on-Fire Bad' ruling.
Full Story
🧩 Simple Version
In Iran, massive protests against the government, initially sparked by a collapsing economy, have spread nationwide, turning into demands for regime change. The government’s response has been, shall we say, less than diplomatic.
Reports from a Tehran doctor suggest hundreds of protesters have been killed, mostly by live ammunition. The regime also decided to cut off internet and phone access, presumably to make it harder for everyone to realize how truly bad things are. This all unfolded despite U.S. President Donald Trump's warning that Iran would “pay hell” for harming protesters.
⚖️ The Judgment
After careful consideration, reviewing the evidence (which, ironically, the regime tried to block from being seen), and consulting our imaginary ethics-o-meter, we officially declare this situation to be: ABSOLUTELY DEMOCRACY-ON-FIRE BAD!
“The use of live ammunition against unarmed civilians, coupled with an egregious attempt to silence communication, represents a fundamental betrayal of civic trust and a catastrophic failure of basic human decency.”
Why It’s Bad (or Not)
Let's break down the sheer audacity here, shall we? This isn't just