The actual consequences of this administrative theater extend far beyond just a name on a building. They delve into the fabric of governance and public trust.

For People, this diversion of presidential attention means that critical issues like escalating healthcare costs, reduced food security, and surging energy prices continue to worsen without genuine executive focus. Promises made regarding IVF, inflation, and protecting earned benefits remain unfulfilled. While the President is preoccupied with symbolic gestures of self-aggrandizement, everyday Americans are left to grapple with very real and practical financial hardships.

The Corruption Risk inherent in this situation is subtle but profoundly potent. When unquestioning loyalty, rather than demonstrated competence or merit, becomes the sole criterion for high-level appointments to national boards, it fundamentally erodes public trust in governmental institutions. This environment fosters a culture where personal gain and political subservience are prioritized over genuine public service, thereby paving the way for further abuses of power. Who ultimately benefits? The President's ego. Who ultimately loses? The integrity of government and the citizens who rely on it for fair and effective governance.

This is a quintessential case of Short-Sighted Decisions. Attempting to strong-arm a name change that is legally invalid creates entirely unnecessary political and legal battles. Such actions waste precious governmental resources and divert attention from the pressing demands of actual governance. More critically, it highlights a consistent pattern of leadership that prioritizes self-glorification over effective problem-solving, crafting a legacy that could be easily dismantled the moment a new administration assumes office. As the original commentary aptly notes, all these self-bestowed honors will likely be “torn down” eventually.