Monday, December 22, 2025
Summary
The White House attempted a photo smear, mislabeling celebrity children as Epstein victims. Ethics committee notes *bad Photoshop skills*.
Full Story
🧩 Simple Version
In a move that surprised absolutely no one watching the political circus, the White House deputy press secretary, Abigail Jackson, found herself in a digital pickle. She posted a photo, supposedly from the recently released Jeffrey Epstein files, hinting that it showed former President Bill Clinton alongside Epstein's victims. The only tiny, insignificant problem? The picture actually featured Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, and Diana Ross with their respective children at a public fundraiser. The internet, ever vigilant, immediately called out the obvious error.
This little slip-up came right after Congress forced the release of a trove of Epstein-related documents, images, and recordings. Adding to the mystery, multiple reports, including from The Associated Press and CBS, noted that several files mysteriously vanished from the Department of Justice's (DOJ) public release within hours, leading to whispers of selective information control.
⚖️ The Judgment
This situation is not just bad; it is ABSOLUTELY DEMOCRACY-ON-FIRE BAD. This isn't just a simple mistake; it's a political Hail Mary pass that sailed so far out of bounds it landed in a swamp of misinformation and bad optics.
Why It’s Bad (or Not)
- Infraction #1: The Old Switcheroo. The White House, in its infinite wisdom, seemed to think a publicly available photo of celebrity children could be rebranded as evidence in a heinous sex trafficking case. That's not transparency; that's transparency theater with a broken projector.
- Infraction #2: False Accusations Against Minors. To imply that children present in a public photo are victims of Jeffrey Epstein's crimes, when they are clearly identified as the children of famous musicians, is not just ethically dubious, it’s downright reckless. It shows a profound disregard for truth and the gravity of the subject matter.
- Infraction #3: The Vanishing Files Act. While the White House was busy with its photo-op blunder, a significant number of the actual Epstein files reportedly performed a Houdini act, disappearing without a trace or explanation from the DOJ's public portal. Coincidence? Our Magic 8-Ball says, "Don't count on it." This smells less like an oversight and more like a carefully choreographed information ballet.